Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 

News:

SMF - Just Installed!


Author Topic: DBC-SG: Let’s Unite Against Speculative Invoicing  (Read 46027 times)

Offline greentara

  • Administrator
  • Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 1778
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • My detailed profile
Re: DBC-SG: Let’s Unite Against Speculative Invoicing
« Reply #30 on: October 26, 2015, 09:33:19 AM »
Campaign Statistics (from Round 2 + 3 onwards), with Round 3 highlighted in Yellow:


Offline greentara

  • Administrator
  • Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 1778
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • My detailed profile
Re: DBC-SG: Let’s Unite Against Speculative Invoicing
« Reply #31 on: January 07, 2016, 09:01:45 PM »
2nd Invoice from IP Defense Lawyer:

Offline greentara

  • Administrator
  • Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 1778
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • My detailed profile
Re: DBC-SG: Let’s Unite Against Speculative Invoicing
« Reply #32 on: March 15, 2016, 05:19:42 PM »
3rd Invoice from IP Defense Lawyer:

Offline greentara

  • Administrator
  • Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 1778
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • My detailed profile
Re: DBC-SG: Let’s Unite Against Speculative Invoicing
« Reply #33 on: March 15, 2016, 05:25:32 PM »

Offline greentara

  • Administrator
  • Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 1778
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • My detailed profile
Re: DBC-SG: Let’s Unite Against Speculative Invoicing
« Reply #34 on: April 10, 2017, 02:42:35 PM »
10 April 2017 Updates

1. The DBC-SG journey started 24 months ago (on 11 April 2015).

2. Trials, tribulations and suffering are 3 suitable words to describe those who received the DBC / SSLC letter of demand.

3. Kindness, generousity and selflessness are 3 suitable words to describe those (mostly Singapore-based residents) who were contributed to the DBC-SG crowd-funding campaigns.

   

4. For public record purposes, collected funds were solely used to pay for the defense legal fees - none were used for settlement, because as the DBC / SSLC cases are invalid and as such, we did not (and still do not) see a sensible reason to settle.

5. The remaining amount of funds = $2,415.02 (RF).

6. There is no movement from SSLC / DBC on the DBC cases for the past many months ago. While this implies a high probability that the DBC nightmare in Singapore is over, there still exist a minute chance that SSLC / DBC will try some other tricks on selected cases.

7. I will continue to monitor this situation for a while longer and in the meantime, I welcome the DBC-SG crowd sourcing contributors to write to me on what we can do with RF.

Rdgs,
Dr. Green
Chairperson of DBC-SG Support Group.

Offline ainat

  • Administrator
  • Jr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 55
  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: DBC-SG: Let’s Unite Against Speculative Invoicing
« Reply #35 on: October 16, 2020, 01:34:56 PM »
10 April 2017 Updates

1. The DBC-SG journey started 24 months ago (on 11 April 2015).
:
:
5. The remaining amount of funds = $2,415.02 (RF).
:
:
Rdgs,
Dr. Green
Chairperson of DBC-SG Support Group.

On behalf of all the DBC-SG contributors, the entire RF ($2,415,02) was donated to the Community Chest of Singapore in 2020.

May all merits from this act be dedicated to all beings.


Offline ainat

  • Administrator
  • Jr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 55
  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: DBC-SG: Let’s Unite Against Speculative Invoicing
« Reply #36 on: October 25, 2020, 04:24:40 PM »
Dallas Buyers Club LLC v iiNet Limited [2015] FCA 317 (7 April 2015)
Federal Court of Australia  (AustLII) 6 May 2015

Dallas Buyers Club, LLC v iiNet Limited (No 1) [2014] FCA 1232 (17 November 2014)
Federal Court of Australia  (AustLII) 16 December 2015

Dallas Buyers Club, LLC v iiNet Limited (No 2) [2014] FCA 1320 (3 December 2014)
Federal Court of Australia  (AustLII) 7 April 2015

Dallas Buyers Club LLC v iiNet Limited (No 3) [2015] FCA 422 (6 May 2015)
Federal Court of Australia  (AustLII) 17 November 2014

Dallas Buyers Club LLC v iiNet Limited (No 4) [2015] FCA 838 (14 August 2015)
Federal Court of Australia  (AustLII) 14 August 2015

Dallas Buyers Club LLC v iiNet Limited (No 5) [2015] FCA 1437 (16 December 2015)
Federal Court of Australia  (AustLII) 3 December 2014

Source: http://dishonest.biz/forum/zip/Dallas%20Buyers%20Club%20LLC%20v%20iiNet%20Limited.7Z